What do you feel are the criteria of a New Age Hub?
For me the question of a “New Age Hub” sounds too much like a fashion statement. There is nothing “New Age” about the philosophies and therapies being offered; just old wine in new skins.
Is Singapore too serious for New Age?
Perhaps conservative would be a better term; Eastern cultures come with their own traditional teachings and however cosmopolitan the average Singaporean may consider himself, when it comes to his spirituality, most tend to go back to their original roots.
Have Singaporeans generally become more spiritually-aware in recent years?
I would say that with the average standard of living rising tremendously compared to other developed countries, Singaporeans are now becoming increasingly aware that material and tangible possessions do not suffice. They are looking for a spiritual path that not only complements their beliefs but also their lifestyle.
Do you see a trend towards alternative medicine complementing or even replacing conventional medicine?
Definitely not. And I would say that the ideal would be for alternative therapies to be used as a complement to conventional medicine, which is the case in many countries currently.
What are the obstacles, if any, that are hindering spiritual or metaphysics activities in Singapore?
I would say that a belief persists that many of these metaphysical teachings have occult foundations and the unease this generates creates resistance. Also, more should be done to educate the public that these methods or teachings do not conflict with mainstream religious beliefs, that in fact many “New Age” teachings draw from organised religions.
What more can be done to transform Singapore into a more vibrant New Age Hub?
It should be made accessible to the masses. Right now, I believe there is a mindset that such activities are the domain of the well-heeled or the “in” crowd. This should be done without sacrificing the idealism that started the “New Age” movement; to empower everyone to find their true spirituality.






COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE