The Nature of Our Reality – What Modern Science Tells Us
TAGS:  •   •   •   •   •   •   • 

Extracted from “The Coming Golden Age and How to Prepare for it” by Dr. Richard Presser. Richard’s e-book begins with what modern science is telling us about our reality and extends this into the spiritual realm to look at the extraordinary unfolding of consciousness that’s happening in our time. This unfolding is usually referred to as Ascension. As with the science, he also provides the evidence for what he is saying and provides some unique guidance and signposts for the journey. You will find it at www.thecominggoldenage.com.

The great revolutions in physics of the 20th century were Einstein’s relativity theories, and quantum physics. These theories together turned our traditional (Newtonian) physics on its head as scientists began to look at the nature of time and space in the realms of lots of energy, tiny bits of matter, tiny amounts of time and speeds which approximate the speed of light. This work showed us that when you begin to look at the fabric of our reality, it begins to look quite bizarre. The basic elements of matter, such as the electron are not simply particles, but waves of probability that are unbounded – until an observer chooses to look. And it depends on how the observer looks as to whether the electron shows up as a wave or a particle. In other words, the outcome or observation is inextricably “entangled” with the observer.

For those interested in studying this in detail, I recommend you watch What the Bleep!? – Down the Rabbit Hole (QUANTUM Three-Disc Special Edition), which is the best, readily absorbable discussion of this I have seen. You may also like to read The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav or check out some of Dr Fed Alan Wolf’s work including Dr. Quantum Presents: A User's Guide To Your Universe and Dr. Quantum Presents: Meet the Real Creator - You! CD sets. There is also a wonderful new book by Marlyse Carroll entitled Am I Going Mad? the Unsettling Phenomena of Spiritual Evolution, which ties the spiritual journey, psychology, shamanism and quantum physics together, woven around Marlyse’s personal story. Dr John Demartini says, ” ’Am I Going Mad?’ is more than just informative, entertaining and inspiring, it is a must read for anyone ready to integrate and self-actualize their spiritual existence – truly a physiological, psychological and spiritual masterpiece for the sake of human evolution.” For me, Marlyse’s book title says it all. This journey is not a journey that the rational mind takes and it can get freaked out by the experience. What modern physics does, especially when correlated with spiritual and mystical experience, is have us realise that the reality we observe in day to day life is not what it seems. In particular, the Unified Field Theory has us realise that we are all one.

Rather than focus on the detail of this since it is well documented by the works listed above and many others, I will outline some less widely publicised work that provides some fascinating insights into the nature of our reality.

Our basic molecules have a special relationship with light

The DNA Phantom Effect - Vladimir Poponin

Vladimir Poponin inserted a strand of DNA into a stream of polarized light. What he found was that the light wrapped itself around the DNA strand. When he removed the DNA, the light continued to show the pattern of the DNA. This tells us that our basic molecules have a special relationship with light and have a powerful ability to influence our environment and reality.

Libet and Feinstein, etc.

Some years ago, Libet and Feinstein conducted some fascinating experiments on patients who had their skullcaps removed for surgical reasons and with the agreement of the patients conducted some stimulus response experiments. The patients were conscious during these experiments. For example, they stimulated, say, a person’s finger and then looked to see how long it was for that stimulation to show in the relevant area of the brain in a way that would produce a response. This state is called neural adequacy. They found a delay of about 500ms before neural adequacy was achieved. Now this is way longer than it takes for us to pull our finger away from something hot, for example. How come? It could be explained by this kind of “decision” being made within our bodies and this does appear to play a part. However, even more interesting is that when they provided the stimulus, then anaesthetised the relevant area of the brain, there was no longer a response to the stimulus. So something being done (anaesthetisation) after the response would have occurred normally, prevented the response that would otherwise have happened in the past.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE